Does one’s education affect how one votes? It’s interesting how people’s political preferences have shifted in the past few decades. Traditionally, people who voted for the more conservative candidate tended to be MORE educated. In many countries, including Canada, the US and the UK, those who historically voted for conservative candidates tended to be well-educated (often at the “good schools”) and worshiped at “old line” Protestant churches (e.g. Anglican/Episcopal). This has changed over the decades. What the US calls a “Rockefeller Republican” or Canadians, a “Red Tory” (note to Americans: our colours are the opposite of yours: Blue=conservative, red=liberal), has all but become extinct. Today, the conservative is more likely to be less educated and evangelical.
I have been reading US election trend demographics. According to all of the polls, the more education one has, the less likely he or she supports McCain. While 42% of those with high school or less support McCain, only 37% of those with a postgraduate degree do. In terms of religion, while they do have church break-down, they unfortunately do not indicate what kind of church people go to. It would be interesting to see support based on evangelical and old line. Of course, the results would likely be very obvious – old line churches, which tend to be more progressive, are generally denominations that do not have a literal interpretation of the Bible. In any case, with all that is going on over the past few weeks, it seems that the Republican Party in the United States has lost its way. Many big-named Republicans, such as Colin Powell, have “jumped ship” and are endorsing Obama.
Canada experienced its official “death” of the old line Conservatives when the Progressive Conservative party went from a majority government with Brian Mulroney and then, Kim Campbell, to not just a Liberal majority, but also a pitiful presence of merely two Conservative seats in 1993. The Reform Party, which became the current Conservative Party of Canada, didn’t take over as the Official Opposition that year (the separatist Bloc Quebecois did), but it eventually took over as Canada’s conservative voice, moving it further to the right. It was much further right. And even now, the Conservative Party is heavily western-centric, especially in Alberta, where they won all but one seat. Alberta is part of Canada’s Bible Belt. There are remnants of old line conservativeness in some Conservative candidates, both provincially and federally, but for the most part, it is dead.
Will old line conservatives, the “Red Tory” or “Rockefeller Republican” ever come back? Or, is this a philosophy that has gone?
In addition to the literal interpretation of the Bible, current conservatives seem to emphasize religion on each and every thing. This wouldn’t be considered “proper” by many denominations.
But this is just MHO. Not sure what other people think. I’d like to see other readers’ thoughts on this.
I don’t think conservatism is going away and I don’t think that McCain or Palin represent true Conservatives, like myself. Not to be a snob but Palin has a pregnant teenage daughter…Conservative values, I think not! I come from a hard working family that believes in education and religion, but in our family the two do not mix. My Presbyterian upbringing is clear…respect yourself and others will follow. It is clear that Palin has little self-respect and she has not taught self-respect to at least one daughter.
What is going on in today’s Republican Party is outrageous and it has driven me away from the party in search of more erudite individuals. To hear Pawlenty stand up and champion teaching intelligent design in public schools makes me nauseous–this is not the party that stands for teaching people how to fish instead of giving people the fish…this is a group of fringe zealots who poison the rivers so that no one can fish…many of these people have not achieved anything of relevance in their personal lives and they seek to torture everyone around them because of their own limitations.